Audit of Applicant Feedback – Long Descriptions
Figure 1: Quality of Peer Reviews by Criteria
|
Approach |
Originality |
Applicant |
Environment |
Impact |
| Pillar 1 |
68% |
21% |
72% |
21% |
20% |
| Pillar 2 |
72% |
45% |
61% |
39% |
47% |
| Pillar 3 |
79% |
40% |
61% |
36% |
48% |
| Pillar 4 |
63% |
39% |
60% |
32% |
42% |
| Combined pillars |
70% |
36% |
64% |
32% |
38% |
« Back to figure 1
Figure 2: Quality of Peer Review - Report Format
|
Synopsis |
Feedback |
Professional |
Budget |
Appropriate |
| Pillar 1 |
62% |
79% |
90% |
52% |
98% |
| Pillar 2 |
73% |
81% |
94% |
57% |
98% |
| Pillar 3 |
73% |
88% |
98% |
64% |
100% |
| Pillar 4 |
65% |
79% |
89% |
50% |
96% |
| Combined pillars |
68% |
81% |
92% |
55% |
98% |
« Back to figure 2
Figure 3: Quality of Scientific Officer Notes
|
Str/weakness |
Greatest impact |
Discussion |
Encouragement |
Feedback |
Budget |
Organized |
Tone |
Appropriate |
| Pillar 1 |
78% |
83% |
61% |
91% |
72% |
67% |
96% |
100% |
100% |
| Pillar 2 |
75% |
77% |
46% |
88% |
71% |
46% |
88% |
100% |
98% |
| Pillar 3 |
79% |
89% |
57% |
93% |
71% |
57% |
93% |
96% |
96% |
| Pillar 4 |
71% |
76% |
38% |
93% |
71% |
31% |
86% |
100% |
95% |
| Combined pillars |
76% |
80% |
50% |
91% |
71% |
50% |
90% |
99% |
98% |
« Back to figure 3
- Date modified:
-